Skip to main content

Are you a lawyer?

MCA..the day democracy was dead!!!
That was what Ti Lian Ker wrote in his blog dated Sept. 26, 2008. He reproduced a scanned document purportedly a Memorandum of Agreement made in April 2002 between the MCA Team A and Team B.
I just fail to understand the relationship between the title to the blog and the documents posted. Why was democracy (in MCA?) dead? Why Ti, being a lawyer by training chose to post a document not duly executed by both parties. In law, documents not duly executed and/or completed by parties involved cannot in any way be construed as binding or at the very least be of any conclusive proof or evidence.
As per my earlier posting at Matthias Chang The Great, I had stated that I was involved in the Team A /Team B crisis and I know fully well the problems and issues faced by MCA then. I am aware of the existence of the Memorandum of Agreement, who prepared same and the manner in which Dato' Lim Ah Lek (now Tan Sri) and Tan Sri Lim Kok Wing had signed the document. I am also mindful that Lim Ah Lek had signed the document at around 12.45 am (past midnight).
Can democracy be dead when parties at loggerhead chose to compromise? Democracy can come in many ways, among others by the "soft" or the "hard" ways. Coming to terms by way of mutual agreements will never in any manner make democracy dead! Isn't compromise a part of democratic process?
At the moment and on many previous postings by Ti, I just fail to understand him. Being a lawyer like Matthias Chang and Lawyer Kampung, I am puzzled...

Comments

  1. aIYOYO BRUTHER! I didn't know u are so emotional and personal here. This happens to be a document I found while clearing my old documents. I am not in a court of law here la. This is a political forum.The document is for the benefit of younger members for whatever it is worth in MCA historical lessons. It is a reminder of the events then. Democracy is dead is to provoke thinking man like you... The subsequent events and the 'status quo' and terms of reference here was much quoted, referred and executed politically and accordingly during the MCA election then. TIS IS PURELY A POLITICAL STATEMENT AND A POLITICAL FACR TOO.
    Being legally trained, you should know that democracy cannot be signed away by neither Lim Ah Lek or Ling Liong Sik. The delegates were never consulted. An EGM could easily be called to decide. Not an MOU by so and so and signed under possible political duress and arm twisting etc etc. Less said for the moment-better..

    Sorry for delay in publishing your comment on my blog. Thanks for your view. Agree to differ. Sibuk campaign la...Well wishes??

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ti is in a class of his own. Dia kuat torture minda orang untuk berfikir. Maybe that's what we need now.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hahaha Brader Ti,
    As big bro surely I wish you best of luck in your endeavour to be voted in as Central Committee of MCA.
    If u had found old documents while clearing is just like digging old graves. Surely u will find skeleton! Hahaha
    I will agree with u if u had posted a duly executed document signed by all parties. Political arguments should not compromise legal restrictions etc...since u agree to disagree! Politicians are bound by the law too?
    Whatever it is, the end result of the subject matter clearly show that democracy is alive, well and flourishing in MCA (for that matter in BN). U subscribe to that and u manifest same by offering urself as candidate in the coming party election. Would u do that if u are dead certain that democracy is dead in MCA?
    Cheers Bro!

    To CIKGU,
    "Ti is in a class of his own"...
    Careful here Cikgu. It can mean the extremes. If one is in a class of his own it can either be a genius or the other extreme a moron. Both cannot join the rest of the class and a special class got to be created for each of the extremes. Each need seperate class & special tuition. In short, even if one is a genius or a moron, he is left alone and will has no classmates!
    "Dia kuat torture minda orang untuk berfikir"...
    Aiyoyoyo.....sadist! Nevertheless if one is a genius, he will think for us. If one is a moron, we have to think for him! Hahaha
    Cikgu, u raise a very interesting subject. Since I cannot get to see ur blog, if u are in Kuantan, do call on me. Maybe can have yam cha for small talk...u know where to get me..

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

No comment moderation but need to know who is commenting. Please let us know who you are. Keep it as professional as possible. Didn't we agree to disagree? Regards and best wishes.(DSN)

Popular posts from this blog

Prerogative of Mercy. Beg Your Pardon...

Ada terpandang video oleh Zaid Ibrahim tentang Pardon. Dia kata itu Prerogative of Mercy oleh Agong dan Raja2. High Prerogative of Mercy....or something like that lah. Itu betul. Tapi kalau nak kata process itu tidak ada procedure tak betul lah. Perlembagaan kita dan Akta Penjara telah tetapkan procedure nya. Agong & Raja2 juga perlu bertindak ikut Perlembagaan dan Undang2. Maka itu lah sebabnya digelar Raja Berperlembagaan. Dalam Perlembagaan ditetapkan mesti diadakan Pardons Board yang dipengerusikan oleh Tuanku sendiri. Antara lain Pardons Board itu akan bermesyuarat, pertimbangkan Petisyen yang dikemukakan, dapatkan nasihat dan pandangan ahli Pardons Board itu dan minta nasihat dan pandangan dari Peguam Negara. Bukan macam cerita filem purba. Bukan macam cerita Sultan Melaka ampunkan Hang Tuah untuk tujuan suruh bertikam dengan Hang Jebat. Bukan sebab Sultan Melaka menyesal tersalah hukum Hang Tuah. Bukan ampunkan Hang Tuah sebab Hang Jebat handal sangat dan hanya Hang Tuah sah

Setiausaha Politik selama 18 tahun (2000-2018)

Apabila YB Dato' Adnan Yaakob dilantik sebagai Menteri Besar Pahang, beliau telefon saya bertanya samada saya hendak tak datang ke Kuantan bekerja dengan dia. "Sam, Long ingat elok awak berubah angin. Mari datang Kuantan kerja dengan Long". Begitu lah kata-kata beliau. Kebetulan tahun 1999 itu saya kurang betul menumpukan perhatian kepada kerja-kerja sebagai lawyer. Anak saya baru meninggal pada 20hb August 1998. Dato' Adnan dilantik sebagai MB pada 25hb Mei 1999. "Come lah work with me. We see how I can place you in the MB's Office" Begitu lah Long Nan beritahu saya. "Boleh lah Long. Setahun dua boleh kot. I like myself more as lawyer, Long...." "OK...mari lah setahun dua" Itu jawab Dato' Adnan. "Tapi Long tak boleh lah bagi awak gaji besar Sam...." Sambung Dato' Adnan. "Kita tengok lah mana yang sesuai". Tambah beliau. Pada mulanya sejak bulan Mei 1999 itu saya hanya berulang alik KL-Kuantan. Tujuan

SEJARAH HITAM PELANTIKAN MOHAN SEBAGAI PEGUAM NEGARA MESTI DIPUTIHKAN.

PEGUAM NEGARA (ATTORNEY GENERAL) DAN PENDAKWARAYA (PUBLIC PROSECUTOR) SEJARAH HITAM PELANTIKAN MOHAN YANG MESTI DIPUTIHKAN. 1. Jawatan Peguam Negara adalah lantikan dibawah Perkara 145 Perlembagaan Persekutuan oleh Yang diPertuan Agong atas nasihat Perdana Menteri. 2. Peguam Negara adalah Peguam kepada Negara dan bertanggungjawab menasihati Agong, Jemaah Menteri dan Menteri dalam hal ehwal Undang-Undang. 3. Peguam Negara adalah juga seorang Pendakwaraya yang mengikut budibicaranya boleh memulakan, membawa, menjalankan atau memberhentikan apa-apa perbicaraan jenayah. Untuk tugas ini dia dipanggil Public Prosecutor. Namun begitu tugas itu tidak termasuk proceeding di mahkamah Syariah, mahkamah Native atau mahkamah tentera. 4. Jawatan itu adalah atas perkenan Agong dan dia boleh meletakkan jawatan pada bila-bila masa. 5. Peguam Negara boleh menentukan mahkamah mana apa-apa proceeding jenayah hendak dijalankan dan boleh juga pindahkan proceeding jenayah ke mahkamah yang dia fikir