Skip to main content

Ketuanan Melayu with Responsibilities?

This is what one person by the name of Dr Syed Alwi wrote to RPK (Raja Petra Kamaruddin) sometime back and was subsequently posted by RPK at Malaysia Today. It received serious debate by bloggers irrespective of race and religion.
Can we blame Article 153 of the Constitution, the NEP and the slogan "ketuanan Melayu" for all the things that happen to the Malays and the Non-Malays in this country? Why can't we just respect each other. Why must we widen the racial divide? Are the Malays not responsible enough in letting all bad things happen to the non-Malays in this country? And is there at all any bad things happening to the non-malays? Are the non-Malays suffering from the policies of NEP and the slogan of Ketuanan Melayu? Dear friends of non-malay origin, lets live together harmoniously and be rest assured, we Malays know our responsibilities to our "Ugama, Bangsa dan Tanahair"

"Dear RPK and other Malaysians,
I find it very strange that political discourse in Malaysia today, revolves around Malay rights (Article 153), Ketuanan Melayu, NEP and so on.For one thing, rights always come with responsibilities. How many Malaysian Malays talk of the Malay responsibilities that accompany their much touted Ketuanan Melayu? It makes no sense to me to talk of rights without qualifying it with responsibilities. You want to be a Tuan? Then you must also shoulder the responsibility of being the Tuan. That's only fair and reasonable. And what might those responsibilities be? Here is a sample:1) The responsibility to maintain racial and religious harmony.2) The responsibility to maintain sustainable economic development for all3) The responsibility to pursue scientific and technological developmentand so on. But it seems to me that those who want to be Tuans have not fulfilled their responsibilities! So how to be a Tuan? I have been following Malaysian politics since the early nineties. Throughout this entire period - not even one Malaysian Malay leader raised the issue of Malay responsibilities that ought to come with Malay rights and the Ketuanan Melayu. Thats very telling of the Malaysian psyche. Its pretty damning!To talk of rights without responsibilities will only encourage people to take advantage of the situation. After all - who does not want freebies and unlimited social welfare in the form of the NEP? From tongkat to wheelchair and then finally - to the ambulance!Yes - keep Article 153 and the NEP. But balance it with Malay responsibilities. Only children have rights without responsibilities. To be a true Tuan, you also need to shoulder the Tuan's responsibility.
Best Regards
Dr Syed Alwi"
By the way, who is Dr Syed Alwi?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Prerogative of Mercy. Beg Your Pardon...

Ada terpandang video oleh Zaid Ibrahim tentang Pardon. Dia kata itu Prerogative of Mercy oleh Agong dan Raja2. High Prerogative of Mercy....or something like that lah. Itu betul. Tapi kalau nak kata process itu tidak ada procedure tak betul lah. Perlembagaan kita dan Akta Penjara telah tetapkan procedure nya. Agong & Raja2 juga perlu bertindak ikut Perlembagaan dan Undang2. Maka itu lah sebabnya digelar Raja Berperlembagaan. Dalam Perlembagaan ditetapkan mesti diadakan Pardons Board yang dipengerusikan oleh Tuanku sendiri. Antara lain Pardons Board itu akan bermesyuarat, pertimbangkan Petisyen yang dikemukakan, dapatkan nasihat dan pandangan ahli Pardons Board itu dan minta nasihat dan pandangan dari Peguam Negara. Bukan macam cerita filem purba. Bukan macam cerita Sultan Melaka ampunkan Hang Tuah untuk tujuan suruh bertikam dengan Hang Jebat. Bukan sebab Sultan Melaka menyesal tersalah hukum Hang Tuah. Bukan ampunkan Hang Tuah sebab Hang Jebat handal sangat dan hanya Hang Tuah sah

Setiausaha Politik selama 18 tahun (2000-2018)

Apabila YB Dato' Adnan Yaakob dilantik sebagai Menteri Besar Pahang, beliau telefon saya bertanya samada saya hendak tak datang ke Kuantan bekerja dengan dia. "Sam, Long ingat elok awak berubah angin. Mari datang Kuantan kerja dengan Long". Begitu lah kata-kata beliau. Kebetulan tahun 1999 itu saya kurang betul menumpukan perhatian kepada kerja-kerja sebagai lawyer. Anak saya baru meninggal pada 20hb August 1998. Dato' Adnan dilantik sebagai MB pada 25hb Mei 1999. "Come lah work with me. We see how I can place you in the MB's Office" Begitu lah Long Nan beritahu saya. "Boleh lah Long. Setahun dua boleh kot. I like myself more as lawyer, Long...." "OK...mari lah setahun dua" Itu jawab Dato' Adnan. "Tapi Long tak boleh lah bagi awak gaji besar Sam...." Sambung Dato' Adnan. "Kita tengok lah mana yang sesuai". Tambah beliau. Pada mulanya sejak bulan Mei 1999 itu saya hanya berulang alik KL-Kuantan. Tujuan

SEJARAH HITAM PELANTIKAN MOHAN SEBAGAI PEGUAM NEGARA MESTI DIPUTIHKAN.

PEGUAM NEGARA (ATTORNEY GENERAL) DAN PENDAKWARAYA (PUBLIC PROSECUTOR) SEJARAH HITAM PELANTIKAN MOHAN YANG MESTI DIPUTIHKAN. 1. Jawatan Peguam Negara adalah lantikan dibawah Perkara 145 Perlembagaan Persekutuan oleh Yang diPertuan Agong atas nasihat Perdana Menteri. 2. Peguam Negara adalah Peguam kepada Negara dan bertanggungjawab menasihati Agong, Jemaah Menteri dan Menteri dalam hal ehwal Undang-Undang. 3. Peguam Negara adalah juga seorang Pendakwaraya yang mengikut budibicaranya boleh memulakan, membawa, menjalankan atau memberhentikan apa-apa perbicaraan jenayah. Untuk tugas ini dia dipanggil Public Prosecutor. Namun begitu tugas itu tidak termasuk proceeding di mahkamah Syariah, mahkamah Native atau mahkamah tentera. 4. Jawatan itu adalah atas perkenan Agong dan dia boleh meletakkan jawatan pada bila-bila masa. 5. Peguam Negara boleh menentukan mahkamah mana apa-apa proceeding jenayah hendak dijalankan dan boleh juga pindahkan proceeding jenayah ke mahkamah yang dia fikir