SMALL TALK

Gambar ini bakal timbul lagi. Kalau dulu lebam di kiri, sekarang entah apa pula yang akan dibuatnya. Dulu katanya orang yang nama Anwar, berani. Kenapa pula bersembunyi di Kedutaan Turki? Nak takut apa kalau tidak salah. Lies can be created But no one can create the truth. Let the Police do their job. Let them investigate. Let us be fair. No one is above the law. No one should be given special preference. Case of sodomy is nothing new. The law on it is clear. It can be investigated by any police officer. No need for the whole Police Force to be involved. No need for the Director of CID to be involved. If the complainant and the suspect are just orang kampung, I don't think the Director of CID will be involved. Lets treat Anwar & Saiful the same. Sodomy is sodomy no matter who is the complainant or the suspect.

This is what Dato ' Ahmad Husni Hanazlah said of Khir Toyo as reported in the NST of today 30 th June 2008. If you are a leader, you are supposed to be the leader for all. Not just for the Malays or the Chinese or the Indians or the Ibans . Was it really Khir Toyo who demolished the temple concerned? Was it not done by Orders of the Court. When I was Senior Assistant Registrar of the High Court in the 80s, I did carry out Orders to demolish too. Orders made by the Court upon Writ of Possession. Can Khir Toyo stop the Court Order? I don't think so. If Khir Toyo was really in a position to postpone the demolition and if he did not do so, then he should be blamed. Execution of Court Orders can be postponed. Justice must always be tempered with mercy. If the temple need to be used for prayers in a few days time, why can't it be postponed? Will there be Hindraf if not for the demolition of the temple? If so, sorry Khir Toyo , I agree with Ahmad Husni .... I will al...

THE CARD SAYS IT ALL....FRIENDS, BE THERE PLEASE!

After the 12th GE, everybody jumped into the bandwagon. Serving and retired Wakil Rakyat in Pahang became bloggers as well. Go through the list :- (1) Dato' Ti Lian Ker (YB {Rtd}) http://tilianker.blogspot.com/ (2) Ariff Sabri Aziz (YB {Rtd}) http://sakmongkol.blogspot.com/ and http://mattomoi.blogspot.com/ (3) YB Chuah Boon Seong http://chuahboonseong.blogspot.com/ (4) YB Pang Tsu Ming http://pangtsuming.blogspot.com/ Its interesting to see the contrast in the thinking and the expression of the serving as against the retired YBs. Just wondering whether the present EXCO for ICT know two hoots at all about blogs! And what about the rest of the YBs. Do they know about internet/blogs?

Everybody talks about it now. Lawyers, non-lawyers, politicians and everybody. Some think that independence of the judiciary is the ex- gratia payment to Tun Salleh Abas & gang. Some say independence of the judiciary must mean that the Courts must not be in anyway having any relation or reliance on the Executive or the Legislature. Those are the one who know or heard about the doctrine of separation of powers. Some say that the independence of the judiciary mean that the Bar Council must be given bigger role in the appointment of judges and must be consulted when judges are to be promoted. Others say that the independence of the judiciary must mean that the Courts be upgraded and judges be given all facilities and higher remuneration. Come what may, say what ever you like, the independence of the judiciary was and is never a big issue to anybody during the last election. Who cares what happened in the Courts, who gets appointed or who gets promoted. Make a survey, the courts are...

Semalam, 23hb June 2008, ada usul penstrukturan semula subsidi bahan api. Kenapa perlu di usulkan lagi apabila ia nya telah dilaksanakan. Sepatutnya usulkan & bahaskan dahulu baru dilaksanakan. Pelik & tertanya-tanya apa yang kerajaan BN buat. Semua yang dibuat selepas PRU 12 serba tidak kena.

Acquired Intense Denial Syndrome (AIDS) Kenapa masih deny lagi? Sudah ada satu parti komponen yang secara terang-terangan hilang kepercayaan kepada Pak Lah. Kenapa masih dinafikan? Kenapa masih dipersoalkan yang itu bukan keputusan SAPP tetapi itu pendirian presidennya sahaja? Samada itu pendirian Presidennya atau SAPP tidak penting. Yang pentingnya ada yang sudah tidak percaya kepada Pak Lah. Kenapa pula sebagai jawapan kepada permintaan SAPP/Yong Teck Lee, Pak Lah katakan yang Yong Teck Lee itu tamak. Sudah ditawarkan Senatorship/Special Envoy, Yong Teck Lee masih tidak mahu. Yong Teck Lee bukan tidak percaya sebab jawatan yang dia hendak. Yong Teck Lee tidak percaya sebab apa yang orang Sabah minta masih tidak dapat. Apa yang diminta oleh SAPP terdapat dalam blog parti itu http://sapphq.blogspot.com/ Yang mereka minta adalah seperti berikut : Monday, June 9, 2008 SAPP's 14 Points "Sabah Issues" SAPP's 14 points submitted to the PM on 7 April 2008 . Long and overdue...