tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post1728531441645602873..comments2023-11-05T18:27:57.206+08:00Comments on SMALL TALK: Lawyer setengah lepas enam/ Half past six?Small Talkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14131456468689078006noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-45267554463276022492009-04-22T02:14:00.000+08:002009-04-22T02:14:00.000+08:00Salam Dato' Sham.
"Think" dimaksudkan disini ada...Salam Dato' Sham. <br /><br />"Think" dimaksudkan disini adalah 'fikiran.' Kalau dalam hearing di mahkamah apabila ditanya oleh peguam sesuatu perkara kalau kita kata 'i think" tidak cukup meyakinkan. Kalau peguam yang garang tentunya kita kena herdik. Jawapan yang patut dijawap samaada 'Ya' atau 'Tidak' atau yang seumpamanya. Dato sendiri tentu lebih ariff kerana itu adalah bidang Dato'.<br /><Pak Lubishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05603441015845298768noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-22662540063028878582009-04-21T15:11:00.000+08:002009-04-21T15:11:00.000+08:00Hahaha Pak Lubis,
Kalau masih boleh "think" kira o...Hahaha Pak Lubis,<br />Kalau masih boleh "think" kira ok lagi lah kan? Kalau dah tak boleh think....dah tak boleh tulis lagi lah...dah sampai ajal!<br />Seriously I "think" tu sebab grounds of judgment belum keluar.<br /><br />Salam Pak LubisSmall Talkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14131456468689078006noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-37215278511851086212009-04-21T13:32:00.000+08:002009-04-21T13:32:00.000+08:00Dato Sham.
Quoting your statement " I dont think ...Dato Sham.<br /><br />Quoting your statement " I dont think the present Fed. Ct is wrong in the decision of the Perak case." <br /><br />There you are Dato'.. You "think".. You said it. It is only your thinking. To me what is right may not be what you think or what you think is right may not be right.<br /><br /><br />Quoting you "Memang lah kita akan merasa marah kalau keputusan tidak memihak Pak Lubishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05603441015845298768noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-27466019322976608872009-04-19T23:40:00.000+08:002009-04-19T23:40:00.000+08:00Sdr? Sdri? Wariq...alangkah baiknya kalau sdr/sdri...Sdr? Sdri? Wariq...alangkah baiknya kalau sdr/sdri ada blog yg boleh saya rujuk...komen anda baik tapi lebih baik kalau sdr/sdri buat ulasan lanjut dalam blog anda...dan kita sama-sama bahaskanSmall Talkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14131456468689078006noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-49761896674843805022009-04-19T20:38:00.000+08:002009-04-19T20:38:00.000+08:00Apa nak buat terima keputusan Makamah dengan hati ...Apa nak buat terima keputusan Makamah dengan hati terbuka walaupaun ada perbezaan pendapat dari ahli-ahli dan pakar-pakar perundangan.Tapi harus dingat speker masih lagi orang yang sama,beliau mempunyai kuasa didalam DUN.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-71619289563442381022009-04-19T19:19:00.000+08:002009-04-19T19:19:00.000+08:00Hi Datuk Sham
"Memang lah kita akan merasa marah ...Hi Datuk Sham<br /><br />"Memang lah kita akan merasa marah kalau keputusan tidak memihak kepada kita. ..."<br /><br />I beg to differ. Not if the decision is seen to be fair, usually. ;)<br />But I agree that we should wait for the grounds...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-41935362990740825042009-04-19T18:27:00.000+08:002009-04-19T18:27:00.000+08:00Pak Lubis,
I dont blame you for understanding the ...Pak Lubis,<br />I dont blame you for understanding the law in that way. It is true that the Consitution is the highest law of the land BUT law must be applied with the facts of the case as I had explained earlier.<br />Whilst the Federal Ct is the highest Ct in Malaysia, its decision can be reviewed by its FULL Quorum i.e with a panel of 7 judges if the present decision is found to be manifestly Small Talkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14131456468689078006noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-53871604867890593042009-04-19T16:41:00.000+08:002009-04-19T16:41:00.000+08:00Thank You DSN.
During my study in ITM and now UiTM...Thank You DSN.<br />During my study in ITM and now UiTM from a diploma level to a Degree (not as a law student)but as an accounting student was informed that the Federal Constitution is above all other Act in the Malaysia (correct me if I am wrong).<br /><br />For the Federal Court which is the highest court in the country to ignore what is mentioned in the Federal Constitution is something that Pak Lubishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05603441015845298768noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-31428816737073918942009-04-19T00:45:00.000+08:002009-04-19T00:45:00.000+08:00Dear Pak Lubis and Jed,
Lawyers are supposed to be...Dear Pak Lubis and Jed,<br />Lawyers are supposed to be in Court fully prepared with authourities and the relevant laws when they argue their cases. In this case, I know Tuan Haji Sulaiman Abdullah, the leading counsel for Sivakumar. He was my lecturer way back in 1979 and I know him to be very through and well prepared. I am sure he had argued the case with the Article 72 of the Constitution in Small Talkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14131456468689078006noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-91110233830565258402009-04-18T22:28:00.000+08:002009-04-18T22:28:00.000+08:00Hi Datuk!
;)
Apakah pendapat Datuk mengenai kenyat...Hi Datuk!<br />;)<br />Apakah pendapat Datuk mengenai kenyataan Justice NH Tan, mantan hakim mahkamah rayuan.<br />"This is a perverse judgement of the Federal Court. It is perverse because it is a decision that was made in blatant defiance of Article 72 (1) of the Federal Constitution which says,”The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-44972486764209719992009-04-18T21:50:00.000+08:002009-04-18T21:50:00.000+08:00Agaknya Dato' Shamsuddin ni terlupa Artikel 72 Per...Agaknya Dato' Shamsuddin ni terlupa Artikel 72 Perlembagaan Persekutuan seperti dibawah ini<br /><br />(1) Kesahan apa-apa prosiding di dalam Dewan Undangan mana-mana Negeri tidaklah boleh dipersoalkan di dalam mana-mana mahkamah.Pak Lubishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05603441015845298768noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-37832388107325752702009-04-18T15:29:00.000+08:002009-04-18T15:29:00.000+08:00DSN
nak tanya sikit boleh ke dokumen rasmi DUN Pe...DSN<br /><br />nak tanya sikit boleh ke dokumen rasmi DUN Perak didedahkan tanpa kebenaran speakerTBOhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17530103736453213117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-33779962795856866392009-04-18T15:25:00.000+08:002009-04-18T15:25:00.000+08:00salam DSN
apa pun YB sivakumar masih Speaker di D...salam DSN<br /><br />apa pun YB sivakumar masih Speaker di DUN Perak, tunggu episod seterusnya he heTBOhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17530103736453213117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-90750663951935513012009-04-18T13:48:00.000+08:002009-04-18T13:48:00.000+08:00Cucu,
Puak-puak ni kalau kena kat dia semua betul....Cucu,<br />Puak-puak ni kalau kena kat dia semua betul...kalau kena kat orang lain semua dia putar belit.<br />Lawyer tu masih kat sekolah lagi bila saya dah jadi Magistrate...<br />Entah lah....Small Talkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14131456468689078006noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6987448942076019638.post-65846719694022594452009-04-18T13:25:00.000+08:002009-04-18T13:25:00.000+08:00Salam DSN,
Memang tepat sekali. Saya baru hendak ...Salam DSN,<br /><br />Memang tepat sekali. Saya baru hendak buat posting yang lebih kurang sama. Menyampah juga baca kenyataan lawyer buruk dalam Haprakdaily.Cucu Tok Selampithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00215743439395235084noreply@blogger.com